Thursday, July 07, 2005
Compare/contrast between the people life in urban and rural areas
June 7, 2005
Compare/contrast between the people life in urban and rural areas.
Nowadays many countries develop rapidly to modernize the countries. The development cannot be equal throughout all areas. That makes the difference in many areas, especially the urban and rural areas. However, they are not completely separated. They have both differences and similarities in terms of the people’s life.
For the differences, the first is that the people in urban areas always have to confront the air pollution problem, while the people in rural areas can be close to ^ good environment. This is a disadvantage for people who live in the urban areas. It is ^fact that they have the lung problemm(use plural here) or get sick easier (use adverb form) than the rural people. On the other hand, the urban people have the good public utilities. For example, the hospitals in urban areas are more modern than the hospitals in rural areas. The last difference is the difference of function of things. For example, in Thailand, the rural people usually use the motorcycle while the urban people favor the motorcycle only in rush hours.
For the similarities, both of them can access the information immediately by TV. For example; no matter what happen in any part of the world, they can know ^in the same time. Furthermore, both of them have a good spirit. For example, they have sympathy and willingness to help people when Thais encounter the natural disaster. This is a merit that can be both the urban people and the rural people. Above of all, it is not important that they live any areas because it doesn’t distinguish the rights. For example, both of them have equality to vote^ the political election.
All in all, although the development still goes on continually, many socialists begin to consider the big problem of the development. I suggest the leader in the each country should focus on the difference between the people (possessive)life in urban and rural areas, and try to make ^smaller gap between urban people and rural people. Who can deny the important of the careful development that regards for people in every area?
Out line
Similarities
Both of them can access the information immediately by TV.
Both of them have sympathy and willingness to help people when Thais encounter the natural disaster.
Both of them have equality to vote the political election.
Differences
The people in urban areas always have to confront air pollution problem, while the people in rural areas can be close to good environment.
The hospitals in urban areas are more modern than the hospitals in rural areas.
People in the rural areas usually use the motorcycle; on the other hand, people in urban areas favor the motorcycle only in rush hours.
Second Draft
Compare/contrast between the people life in urban and rural areas.
Nowadays many countries rapidly change to the modernizing countries. The development cannot be equal throughout all areas. That makes the difference in many areas, especially the urban and rural areas. However, they are not completely separated. They have both differences and similarities in terms of the people’s life.
For the differences, the first is that the people in urban areas always have to confront the air pollution problem, while the people in rural areas can be close to ^ good environment. This is a disadvantage for people who live in the urban areas. It is ^fact that they have the lung problemm(use plural here) or get sick easier (use adverb form) than the rural people. On the other hand, the urban people have the good public utilities. For example, the hospitals in urban areas are more modern than the hospitals in rural areas. The last difference is the difference of function of things. For example, in Thailand, the rural people usually use the motorcycle while the urban people favor the motorcycle only in rush hours.
For the similarities, both of them can access the information immediately by TV. For example; no matter what happen in any part of the world, they can know ^in the same time. Furthermore, both of them have a good spirit. For example, they have sympathy and willingness to help people when Thais encounter the natural disaster. This is a merit that can be both the urban people and the rural people. Above of all, it is not important that they live any areas because it doesn’t distinguish the rights. For example, both of them have equality to vote^ the political election.
All in all, although the development still goes on continually, many socialists begin to consider the big problem of the development. I suggest the leader in the each country should focus on the difference between the people (possessive)life in urban and rural areas, and try to make ^smaller gap between urban people and rural people. Who can deny the important of the careful development that regards for people in every area?
Compare/contrast between the people life in urban and rural areas.
Nowadays many countries develop rapidly to modernize the countries. The development cannot be equal throughout all areas. That makes the difference in many areas, especially the urban and rural areas. However, they are not completely separated. They have both differences and similarities in terms of the people’s life.
For the differences, the first is that the people in urban areas always have to confront the air pollution problem, while the people in rural areas can be close to ^ good environment. This is a disadvantage for people who live in the urban areas. It is ^fact that they have the lung problemm(use plural here) or get sick easier (use adverb form) than the rural people. On the other hand, the urban people have the good public utilities. For example, the hospitals in urban areas are more modern than the hospitals in rural areas. The last difference is the difference of function of things. For example, in Thailand, the rural people usually use the motorcycle while the urban people favor the motorcycle only in rush hours.
For the similarities, both of them can access the information immediately by TV. For example; no matter what happen in any part of the world, they can know ^in the same time. Furthermore, both of them have a good spirit. For example, they have sympathy and willingness to help people when Thais encounter the natural disaster. This is a merit that can be both the urban people and the rural people. Above of all, it is not important that they live any areas because it doesn’t distinguish the rights. For example, both of them have equality to vote^ the political election.
All in all, although the development still goes on continually, many socialists begin to consider the big problem of the development. I suggest the leader in the each country should focus on the difference between the people (possessive)life in urban and rural areas, and try to make ^smaller gap between urban people and rural people. Who can deny the important of the careful development that regards for people in every area?
Out line
Similarities
Both of them can access the information immediately by TV.
Both of them have sympathy and willingness to help people when Thais encounter the natural disaster.
Both of them have equality to vote the political election.
Differences
The people in urban areas always have to confront air pollution problem, while the people in rural areas can be close to good environment.
The hospitals in urban areas are more modern than the hospitals in rural areas.
People in the rural areas usually use the motorcycle; on the other hand, people in urban areas favor the motorcycle only in rush hours.
Second Draft
Compare/contrast between the people life in urban and rural areas.
Nowadays many countries rapidly change to the modernizing countries. The development cannot be equal throughout all areas. That makes the difference in many areas, especially the urban and rural areas. However, they are not completely separated. They have both differences and similarities in terms of the people’s life.
For the differences, the first is that the people in urban areas always have to confront the air pollution problem, while the people in rural areas can be close to ^ good environment. This is a disadvantage for people who live in the urban areas. It is ^fact that they have the lung problemm(use plural here) or get sick easier (use adverb form) than the rural people. On the other hand, the urban people have the good public utilities. For example, the hospitals in urban areas are more modern than the hospitals in rural areas. The last difference is the difference of function of things. For example, in Thailand, the rural people usually use the motorcycle while the urban people favor the motorcycle only in rush hours.
For the similarities, both of them can access the information immediately by TV. For example; no matter what happen in any part of the world, they can know ^in the same time. Furthermore, both of them have a good spirit. For example, they have sympathy and willingness to help people when Thais encounter the natural disaster. This is a merit that can be both the urban people and the rural people. Above of all, it is not important that they live any areas because it doesn’t distinguish the rights. For example, both of them have equality to vote^ the political election.
All in all, although the development still goes on continually, many socialists begin to consider the big problem of the development. I suggest the leader in the each country should focus on the difference between the people (possessive)life in urban and rural areas, and try to make ^smaller gap between urban people and rural people. Who can deny the important of the careful development that regards for people in every area?
# posted by Anonymous @ 1:11 PM 
